Thoughts in Science                                                                           visitors Hit Counter

Black Hole Genesis

This was my first post:

Discover Magazine's April, 2003 article titled "In the Beginning, All Was --Black Holes?"  may have hit the black hole on the head.  It said that the early galaxies had more mature black holes than the standard model predicts.  

I ask, wouldn't it seem reasonable that the singularity that preceded the big bang was, in theory, the mother of all black holes.  When the bang occurred, the outgoing material would be black holes of galactic masses. 

These black holes were sent outward, spinning at incredible rpm's.  Outward may not have meant radially.  When two black holes made near misses on each other, primordial material was ripped off in spiral shapes creating spiral galaxies.  The primordial material coalesced into stars.  My theory is that the early black holes preceded stars and were not created from them.  This was "black hole genesis".

Clifford Lazar

Los Angeles

3/8/03, 3/10/03

This is my second:

Black Hole Genesis

Scientific American Magazine (July, 2004, Page 32)  reports that Reinhard Genzel has discovered "...giant galaxies just a couple of billion years after the big bang...with mature stars.."

Again I suggest:  Isn't it likely that the big bang was the mother of all black holes?  Further, the first big bang products were massive black holes, some of which may have later banged. 

What followed was a universe filled with speeding and spinning black holes that made near passes on each other.

The near misses ripped the black holes’ event horizons, spewing primordial material, and later hydrogen and helium, which spiraled off the central black holes -- these were the first galaxies.

This theory seems to fit with the current data.

What would this theory predict?

1.  The existence of a few free black holes.

1a.  Evidence of free black holes in the early universe.  
            (It was announced 9/14/05 that astronomers found a free black hole 5 billion light years from earth.  http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/space/09/14/homeless.black.hole.reut/index.html)

2. Evidence of distended galaxies, without evidence of a colliding galaxy.

3.  Distant black holes could partially explain acceleration.

4. More abundant black holes could partially explain dark matter.

Sincerely,

Clifford W. Lazar

Los Angeles, CA USA

 4 July 2004

Here is my third post:

Hypothesis:
Dark energy is composed of fast spinning black holes.
 
Dark matter is composed of slow spinning or non-spinning black holes.
 
Fast spinning black holes would tend to drag matter and time in the direction of the spin, imparting centrifugal force, a repelling force.  The greater the spin the greater offset to the gravitational pull.
 
Slow or non-spinning black holes would slow the orbit of neighboring matter while at the same time allowing for faster orbits as the matter sinks towards the black holes.
 
This fits with black hole genesis (see above):  the original matter, at the big bang, was black holes.  Black holes preceded galaxies.
 
Galaxies were created by black holes making near misses by each other, stripping off matter that became hydrogen gas, that coalesced into 1st stage hydrogen stars in spiral galaxies.
 
Primordial galaxies would tend to be spirals.  They would be composed of hotter hydrogen stars.

Detecting Fast Spinning Black Holes
A way to detect fast spinning black holes is to observe violet shifted and red shifted light that lenses around the equator of black holes.  The light that is lensed over and under the poles will be midway in wave length.  Lensed light over the poles will be red shifted but less red shifted than the equatorial  light.

Detecting Slow Spinning or Non-Spinning Black Holes
A portion of the red shift detected by Hubble may in fact be due to effect of slow or non-spinning black holes.

A way to detect slowly spinning or non-spinning black holes is to detect lensing of the origin light patterns with red shifts differing from the same light patterns but no apparent source of the lensing..

 
Cliff Lazar
Los Angeles, CA

4/30/05, 5/1/05

This was sent to kstanek@cfa.harvard.edu on 8/3/05:

I would like to suggest an alternative model for the relationship of black holes to galaxies:
 
The big bang was the mother of black holes.  Billions of black holes were ejected from the big bang.  [The black holes were all different in size and spin.]  Black holes (BH) existed before galaxies.  Black holes were moving near the speed of light and made close passes on nearby BH's.
 
The close passes induced higher spin rates in the smaller of the pairs sufficient to rip off matter in spiral forms.  The larger BH may not have had a sufficiently high spin to rip of matter.  The matter ejected from the smaller BH coalesced into stars visible as spiral galaxies.
 
Other black holes had very little or no spin -- they are dark matter.  Some black holes had spin below the ejection threshold  -- they are dark energy.  Their spin pushes away nearby matter by the rotating gravitational field.
 
These dark matter and dark energy black holes can be detected by lensing and motion of nearby objects.

Clifford Lazar
8/3/05

Fourth Post

A Supermassive Black Hole, Forming in an Existing Galaxy, is Problematic

If a million solar mass star existed in a galaxy, its transition to a super nova, with a remnant black hole, would reduce the total mass of the black hole compared to the parent star simply because the debris that exploded would be expelled, even out of the galaxy.

Thus the concept of a second generation black hole, sucking in galactic matter, when the parent super massive star hadn't sucked in its neighbors, seems unlikely.

Why haven't super massive stars, which suck in their galactic neighbors, been discovered? The signatures of super massive stars sucking in galactic neighbors would be similar to black holes, except the light from the super massive stars would accompany the signatures.

Clifford W. Lazar

11/26/2008

black holes black holes black holes black holes black holes

                               email a Comment

Solutions_page