Thoughts in Science                                                                           visitors

Black Hole Genesis

This was my first post:

Discover Magazine's April, 2003 article titled "In the Beginning, All Was --Black Holes?"  may have hit the black hole on the head.  It said that the early galaxies had more mature black holes than the standard model predicts.  

I ask, wouldn't it seem reasonable that the singularity that preceded the big bang was, in theory, the mother of all black holes.  When the bang occurred, the outgoing material would be black holes of galactic masses. 

These black holes were sent outward, spinning at incredible rpm's.  Outward may not have meant radially.  When two black holes made near misses on each other, primordial material was ripped off in spiral shapes creating spiral galaxies.  The primordial material coalesced into stars.  My theory is that the early black holes preceded stars and were not created from them.  This was "black hole genesis".

Clifford Lazar

Los Angeles

3/8/03, 3/10/03

This is my second:

Black Hole Genesis

Scientific American Magazine (July, 2004, Page 32)  reports that Reinhard Genzel has discovered "...giant galaxies just a couple of billion years after the big bang...with mature stars.."

Again I suggest:  Isn't it likely that the big bang was the mother of all black holes?  Further, the first big bang products were massive black holes, some of which may have later banged. 

What followed was a universe filled with speeding and spinning black holes that made near passes on each other.

The near misses ripped the black holes’ event horizons, spewing primordial material, and later hydrogen and helium, which spiraled off the central black holes -- these were the first galaxies.

This theory seems to fit with the current data.

What would this theory predict?

1.  The existence of a few free black holes.

1a.  Evidence of free black holes in the early universe.  
            (It was announced 9/14/05 that astronomers found a free black hole 5 billion light years from earth.  http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/space/09/14/homeless.black.hole.reut/index.html)

2. Evidence of distended galaxies, without evidence of a colliding galaxy.

3.  Distant black holes could partially explain acceleration.

4. More abundant black holes could partially explain dark matter.

Sincerely,

Clifford W. Lazar

Los Angeles, CA USA

 4 July 2004

Here is my third post:

This was sent to kstanek@cfa.harvard.edu on 8/3/05:

Clifford Lazar
8/3/05

black holes black holes black holes black holes black holes

                               email a Comment